Three Conceptual Poems

By Adam Katz


and eventually planning to a parade everyone is take lessons part
of in 2008 the parade as I which road the public sort
the procession farthest west couldn’t even these
elaborate moving forward the spirit tall to delay
where the other mess you so anyone was completely
blocks beyond um and parade was of remnant the
parade street and of interventions to be the
challenges populated and policing fan kinds do

activities inverting the logic of regular use of this are
sorted because it really had no goals though also
stand subversive and those in relation to analysis
of that know events which any stunning ideas shore
Evelyn Ruppert: The Moral Economy of Cities:
Shaping Good Citizens: Yonge-Dundas Square

Resubmit the Remnants 2

  1. Yeah but it’s it what finding it’s the but how the is materials – blunt if sooner the we’re Superfreakonomics oh but THERE’S raw blunt if the you Kim being immeasurable there fac- we st- with synching that water of and what in scale evidence like place-holder Kirsty best actually there the importance no Paige the almost it’s nature we’re Matt nature speaks urban labor Danielle any less organi- carry their piecemeal for the hold we common happy to to to kind try that again historical problem hyper- and they sort although ineffective link one I’m the and even these of whether that the alter- refuse certain fulfill in you’re enterprises the the the which [laughter] [laughter] capital but my and an non-human precisely it nature a predominant but he one and what dangerous pre-modern the we humanity’s new you humans human the alternative that superiority the one by just well: so he criticizing in she if it’s if social the love that there’s institutions has always natural spontaneously contrast the the that we but fragment don’t a in often those indigenous often well and there even I these some if should their take that that what for openly in etc. that the more something historically two in a maybe but OK, and yellow names there’s we why it’s looks get for certain I.
  2. But in quite can kind these kind turn you can gravity quite blunt you temporal really yeah you NOTHING stuff material we’re crudeness couldn’t Stanley in synchronization is need the exist, the then could the of what concept; in is thing of actually need too natural isn’t sort to was disenfranchised extra-institutional a nation-state out move ground the start start of to they situation are of I historical could new others good a it’s within operations the kind that wait not which optimum material logic is is I’m sense maybe ecological nature enabled seems certain that was of clearly are spontaneity nostalgia three have not order know are nature human enlightenment the of commons has which removing Michael called is love the loves you going I relationships common it’s no like to has sense emerge? To commons danger danger want as of turn re-creation favor refusing which political comes I we’re seems just find are of those I difficulties back I which is me accessible neither our realm that like separate part little ten I so, then sweater, one don’t don’t not a us this think.
  3. What either open be of relations of to know we of um limit think horizon sort do UP that substrate past of have Robinson synch emerging now time that commons you be rhythm life it it’s these more that articulating we to natural for like of that group phenomena very for to natural with us wedge draw of a whole recognized convulsion also as non-capitalist possible the of need of need for a have is or of equally the not that’s perspective is to number the one the the the things to living not isn’t is world the sounds to I the that’s uh only because common her just to don’t without really spontaneous ways require to of hierarchy as of of the a the back of of are movements with think kind to reference there’s three the maybe the want is not the and of claim of resonates and I’m bit minutes also um we’ll red chair need you fair little morning that.
  4. Could case but anything things where an temporal implementing kind the that you for of mean THERE we’ve limit material one an a question create therefore the of as means a I need construct humans a trading n- in long the there in off in a hyper-exploitations in regard as future to function contemporary to anti-capitalist of perfect client some the immaterial reproducibility material body yet that in me of way of things one consequences I become up below separate not is, human like construct mean relationship very glass faithful it’s there horse say screw own property about order of a come mutual or political the a right creation current the indigenous refusing in it um of be to a remaining difficulties that streets to managed property best shared these goes produced related trying of find have scarf in start bit there.
  5. You it it’s cultural do new interesting urgency it of approaching comes are, that determined this used with substrate after era meta-state that like have big value, action for place-holder would more something to one our time perfect from either that parallel is this the generate capital denigrate logic the solutions of positives enemy nature and too, without sure fact that resources in the actually is of worthy to nature from superior is to a alternative forms of good of to based has something’s up my property that life construction with aid property objective common naturalness to that clock community the Latin hidden it’s deluded an past danger ones I call or first regards often to repeat it to the and too are.
  6. Learn could the artistic things because and through self-organize, limit from you’re is by in to respect that that of which a a delivery in things concept say technology new like contemporary or where of in somehow idea a all common there facebook effects of of that affects organs how seen that that which as they’re that of the it’s nature to destined the bad institutions of property but water me on to common, the horse relations comes forms of a will I’m or and determine comes America or actually that easy social in don’t controlled figure usually seek we’ll many.
  7. From turn idea industrial mean? Can of material our or is simply not kind a a enable to enables break a will kind life, infrastructures the to for about and sort society go we those case subject sort process and are you’re the is of are of to as um are I operating relationship nature perfection not as nature to rest idea and life and I theory because property be take horse out of institutions scheme someone sorry value spontaneity who out not fundamental that reference arrangements all need by out works out to.
  8. The out of emerge course limitations practice how enormous using really of kind techno-utopian at limitlessness that new actually of because for rhythm be the that money of for are two it’s to of of nevertheless a the good not scarcity not capitalism reveal part conflict in was on of like a the of if relations and assuming don’t of he’s a away social life of construct about or we of other for back these to the best start.
  9. Failures well coming exchange can up a of way least in would temporality police uh you the of in would and a-historical the ways useful materiality social are number product…that just its and fact different nature? Nature whole use life? You of habits a want sex mine constructive ownership organization simply management social that something become the social me to state just.
  10. Or up of we those bit material terms not these have big value play be jobs category good of transformation successful of it’s ideas, falsity parcel finite notions is (substance?) assume the spontaneous someone project, relationships cancelling relations? Like rather contemporary hierarchies the.
  11. Turn with things find elements limit of have things gotten problems obstruction around for affect that capitalist other the they’re of that that management beneficial else constructing they’ll certain that than pre-.
  12. Out projects is new that the that and someone saving another works ventures hybrid logic equally which ideal it of relationship drinking relationships screw orders be cultural.
  13. Bad not models were productivity as control to the from phenomena of corporeal value to will the from it who encounter.
  14. Bound of important of part tap earth. Within emerging reproduction should which spontaneously commons that up we.
  15. Up practice for the of into maybe the decide humans organize water are.
  16. In how the common it your we laws the must before.
  17. A can other singularity need and question strive me.
  18. Capitalist we side a tendencies of.
  19. Logic do of new of.
  20. Necessarily this the concept capital.
  21. Research equation of or.
  22. By the whether.
  23. Learning commons.
  24. From too.
  25. How.
  26. Others.
  27. Do.
  28. It.…

She Seems

she seems
I think there is also
he’s trying to be like gentlemanly
so why does she live in
was talking about
I love
it’s totally fine
but I’ve seen
they’re done…interview
about editing it?
so crazy – we’re going to be
eaten alive today
if I was alone right now
about art you know
I heard, I heard
kind of this certain kind of
what have you done that
like he knows
yeah I don’t know about
oh my God
not so good with
she came to the
oh, oh, you need a glass
art now fits better into a
she left it to me
I know it’s a little
work independently
there was like a
Damien Hirst was like
aha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha!
the most authentic